Sunday, June 14, 2009

The Hidden Costs of Mutual Funds

A lot of people invest in mutual funds because they believe that these mutual funds deliver a better return than they could hope to achieve in their lifetimes. Couple this with the glitzy advertising that mutual funds employ that it is difficult to avoid parting with at least some money to the friendly neighborhood financial advisor.

Nonetheless, the fact remains that past performance is not a measure for future performance. Mutual funds are linked to the markets and markets can move up, down and sideways for years.

The biggest problem of investing in mutual funds is not so much average or poor performance but the fact that most funds perform poorly is because the fund manager and the asset management company take large slices of the profit pie even before it reaches your table.

Costs are the biggest problem with mutual funds and responsible for most of the sub-par performance of the funds. What is worse is that the fund industry go out of their way to hide costs by using complex financial structures and using complicated terms. Most investors lack understanding of these and hence do not question.

Fees can be broken down into two categories:

1. Ongoing yearly fees to keep you invested in the fund.

2. Transaction fees paid when you buy or sell shares in a fund (loads).

The Expense Ratio

Cost of hiring fund managers: Usually 0.5 percent to 1 percent of the assets under management. This may appear small but note that this is the value of the assets and not a percentage of profits. Thus this sum gets deducted before the profits are calculated. Sometimes this could work up to 40 percent of the profits made by this fund manager.

Administrative Costs

Costs of postage, accounting, customer service, rents, staff, etc.

Advertising and Promotions

Brokerage commissions paid when purchasing shares and toward advertising and promoting the fund.

On the whole, expense ratios range from as low as 0.2% (usually for index funds) to as high as 2%. The average equity mutual fund charges around 1.3%-1.5%.

Loads or Distribution Costs

There are entry loads and exit loads. Loads are costs paid to ensure the funds are available at every nook and corner. They are also called distribution costs. These are paid to the mutual fund agents. The extra kickback you receive from your mutual fund agent is a portion of the load he receives.

Loads comprise entry and exit loads. Entry loads are when you pay a fee to enter a mutual fund. Usually 2-5 percent of the investment. So if you pay Rs 1,000 for the investment in to the mutual fund, you will get just Rs 950 worth of units.

Exit loads are charged if you exit the fund before a certain time period. For example, some funds will charge an exit load if you disinvest before one year while others will lock you in for 3 or 5 years. As the number of years increase the exit load is expected to reduce and in the last year of the lock-in, it becomes zero.

The key to good mutual fund investing is to purchase units of those funds which do not charge any kind of loads.

2 Comments:

Rashmi said...

all valid points...
however, in my opinion it does make sense to be invested in MFs especially if you do not have the time or the inclination to do solid research of investing in stocks.
for eg... quite a few of ,my MFs are easily giving 37-40% returns in 2-3 years.
Insightful post!

yagnesh said...

Over and above the costs there are also restrictions on the MF's on the kind of mobility of funds they can do.

If MFs were able to move money like FII all the FII's would be saving their underwear is my opinion.

http://learnthetrick.blogspot.com/2008/10/sure-way-to-loss-mutual-fund.html

KM

ADBRITE REF

IN PASSING

Consider how the crisis has unfolded over the past eighteen months. The proximate cause is to be found in the housing bubble or more exactly in the excesses of the subprime mortgage market. The longer a double-digit rise in house prices lasted, the more lax the lending practices became. In the end, people could borrow 100 percent of inflated house prices with no money down. Insiders referred to subprime loans as ninja loans—no income, no job, no questions asked. - George Soros in latest book


“When
everything’s going up, there’s a feelgood factor and people tell each other how much their houses are going up at dinner parties,” says Professor Mark Stephens of York University’s Centre for Housing Policy. “Then the music stops, as it always does.”

“Last
year, Japan was a more attractive market to put money in. If you look at the US, we can now get an internal rate of return of 25% there, so why would anyone want to come to India?” - a senior executive at an international financial services group, who did not wish to be named.

"Most
people told us house prices never go down on a national level, and that there had never been a default of an investment-grade-rated mortgage bond, "Mortgage experts were too caught up." - John Paulson, trader, who bet against subprime market and made $15 billion.

The
most puzzling are the real-estate projects of Parsvnath. Just have a look at the Pride Asia project near Chandigarh. They are asking almost US $300K-$350 K dollars for 2 bed room apartments. They have Villas in this project that costs more than US $1.5 million dollars. It is true that some people in India have that kind of money in India. However most of their wealth is black money and that can not be used to buy these properties. Obviously, these projects have been launched keeping NRIs in mind. - Sanjeev, comment from another site

Prachi
Desai, aka Bani, the star of Balalji Telefilms's soap, Kasam Se, has been house hunting for over a year. She had almost closed a 2-BHK deal last year for Rs 1.5 crore in a Oberoi Constructions' building located at Andheri, Mumbai, but when she went back to confirm it, she was asked to cough up Rs 2.61 crore. Since then, she is still house hunting. - Mumbai Mirror

AD BRITE

Your Ad Here